Service Animals, Emotional Support Animals, and Guide Dogs6076922

จาก BIA
รุ่นปรับปรุงเมื่อ 22:55, 28 กันยายน 2563 โดย DiedrattlmpnfbzpChilson (พูดคุย | เรื่องที่เขียน) (สร้างหน้าด้วย "Sadly, some people are asking whether "service animal" laws are increasingly being abused by those who want to scam the system. There have been news sto...")

(ต่าง) ←รุ่นปรับปรุงก่อนหน้า | รุ่นล่าสุด (ต่าง) | รุ่นปรับปรุงถัดไป→ (ต่าง)

Sadly, some people are asking whether "service animal" laws are increasingly being abused by those who want to scam the system.

There have been news stories, articles, opinion pieces and other editorials where people rant and complain about people they believe to be abusing the system. You hear some complain that they had to sit near your pet dog at a restaurant they don't believe can be a "real" service dog, or others complain that the neighbors possess a pet in the "no pet" building because they claimed your pet is esa doctors near me.

Some of the commentary comes with an indignant tone, and a few people are downright angry.

So how exactly does this affect those who legitimately own and employ a service animal to better their lives? In lots of ways.

For one, it could it more challenging to navigate bureaucracy around the globe when your claim of your disability and your service or emotional support animal's status is questioned. If a landlord or business proprietor has heard negative stories claiming that many people are abusing the device, it can cause them to look suspiciously at all claimants.

Some landlord and companies have begun asking for proof of status, although asking for written or another evidence is not always legal, and even though many people who just love legitimate service animals and emotional support animals have not taken advantage of registering them, and therefore have no such documentation to make.

It is the suspicious attitude and illegal demands of some landlords and business owners that make registrations services just like the Service Animal Registry of California so important legitimate owners.

Although registration is optional, it can benefit shortcut the housing rental and business access issues when the owner can create a simple document which will often fulfill the owner or landlord. Also, when using public spaces, it is often easier to give a document with a simple sentence stating, "This can be a service animal" and letting the other party browse the information, instead of having a long-winded protracted conversation (or worse, argument) in public areas, with onlookers listening in and gathering across the discussion.

So, perform some people scam the device, or game regulations? Sadly, the answer is "probably yes." In everyday life, there is always room for abuse and people can make an effort to take advantage of many systems that people as a society set up to protect the rights of those that need such protection. For example, many drivers falsely display disabled parking placards to take advantage of free and convenient parking. Not to mention the number of people who lie on the tax returns, claim improper tax deductions, abuse shop return policies, or do other bad acts.

However that percentage of abuse, which in service animal laws is hopefully small, is arguably a very small investment when compared to the higher purpose of promoting access and equality for many.

In the end, you cannot control any system making it 100% abuse proof. So tolerating the not enough people who scam service animal laws may be the price we gladly pay to make sure that the disabled in the great condition of California have equal access under law.