Service Animals, Emotional Support, and Guide Dogs5928263

จาก BIA
รุ่นปรับปรุงเมื่อ 22:55, 28 กันยายน 2563 โดย LilianaezzaqnfctvBrennon (พูดคุย | เรื่องที่เขียน) (สร้างหน้าด้วย "Sadly, some people are asking whether "service animal" laws are increasingly being abused by people who want to scam the system. There have been news st...")

(ต่าง) ←รุ่นปรับปรุงก่อนหน้า | รุ่นล่าสุด (ต่าง) | รุ่นปรับปรุงถัดไป→ (ต่าง)

Sadly, some people are asking whether "service animal" laws are increasingly being abused by people who want to scam the system.

There have been news stories, articles, opinion pieces and other editorials where people rant and complain about people they feel to be abusing the machine. You hear some complain that they to sit near your pet dog at a restaurant they don't believe is really a "real" service dog, forms of languages complain their neighbors possess a pet inside a "no pet" building because they claimed your pet is esa doctors.

A few of the commentary has an indignant tone, and a few people are downright angry.

How can this affect those who legitimately own and use a service animal to raised their lives? In lots of ways.

For one, it can it harder to navigate bureaucracy of the world when your claim of a disability as well as your service or emotional support animal's status is questioned. If a landlord or business owner has heard negative stories claiming that some individuals are abusing the device, it can cause these phones look suspiciously whatsoever claimants.

Some landlord and business owners have begun asking for proof of status, although asking for written or any other evidence might not be legal, although many those who own legitimate service animals and emotional support animals haven't taken advantage of registering them, and so have no such documentation to create.

It is the suspicious attitude and illegal demands of some landlords and business owners that make registrations services such as the Service Animal Registry of California so vital to legitimate owners.

Although registration is optional, it will also help shortcut the housing rental and business access issues when the owner can produce a simple document which will often match the owner or landlord. Also, when using public spaces, it is usually easier to give over a document with a simple sentence stating, "This can be a service animal" and letting the other party see the information, as opposed to having a long-winded protracted conversation (or even worse, argument) in public, with onlookers listening in and gathering round the discussion.

So, perform some people scam the machine, or game what the law states? Sadly, the reply is "probably yes." In life, there is always room for abuse and individuals can attempt to take advantage of many systems that individuals as a society set up to protect the rights of those that need such protection. For example, many drivers falsely display disabled parking placards to benefit from free and convenient parking. As well as the number of people who lie on the tax returns, claim improper tax deductions, abuse shop return policies, or do other bad acts.

But that percentage of abuse, which around service animal laws is hopefully small, could well be a very small price to pay when compared to the higher purpose of promoting access and equality for those.

In the end, you cannot control any system making it 100% abuse proof. So tolerating the few individuals who scam service animal laws may be the price we gladly pay to ensure the disabled in the great condition of California have equal access under law.